Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Sat Dec 13, 2014 5:37 pm  

JEAN CAPDOUZE wrote:

What does that phrase mean? Is that the Wigan vernacular?

A Wigan fan would tell you, except none of them know what "vernacular" means.

Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Sat Dec 13, 2014 5:42 pm  

Cronus wrote:

Austin Healey. Cocky gobsh*te. If there was ever a face you wanted to punch....

I blame the parents myself.......naming their son after their favourite car.

Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Sat Dec 13, 2014 7:04 pm  

Have to agree with Nothus, Cronus and CrusaderPete. The patronising, condescending and downright bigoted comments of the overgrown public schoolboy type commentators and pundits caused me to have to switch off in the end. Required one month's notice given to BT Sport to cancel subscription. No more Union for me thanks. Absolute cr@p anyway.

Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Sat Dec 13, 2014 7:11 pm  

Mr Churchill wrote:

Have to agree with Nothus, Cronus and CrusaderPete. The patronising, condescending and downright bigoted comments of the overgrown public schoolboy type commentators and pundits caused me to have to switch off in the end. Required one month's notice given to BT Sport to cancel subscription. No more Union for me thanks. Absolute cr@p anyway.

So after signing up to watch a sport you didnt like it is the commentary team that has made you decide to cancel your subscription?
if i were you, id seek professional help.

Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Sat Dec 13, 2014 7:21 pm  

Not sure what generates your need to write personally abusive and unwarranted comments about rugby league fans on here at the drop of a hat. If you had actually read my opening post, you would know that I do not watch Union, but subscribed to BT Sport so I could watch Sam Burgess' debut. It was only after doing so that I commented on, basically, how cr@p I found that game to be.

Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Sat Dec 13, 2014 7:49 pm  

Mr Churchill wrote:

Not sure what generates your need to write personally abusive and unwarranted comments about rugby league fans on here at the drop of a hat. If you had actually read my opening post, you would know that I do not watch Union, but subscribed to BT Sport so I could watch Sam Burgess' debut. It was only after doing so that I commented on, basically, how cr@p I found that game to be.

You subscribed to a channel with the sole intention of watching a sport that you don't like. You then posted this strange action on an internet forum dedicated to rugby league.......

Believe me, me calling you unbalanced is you getting off lightly.

Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Sat Dec 13, 2014 8:04 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

So after signing up to watch a sport you didnt like it is the commentary team that has made you decide to cancel your subscription?
if i were you, id seek professional help.

No he said it was absolutely crap anyway!

Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Sat Dec 13, 2014 8:04 pm  

Mr Churchill wrote:

Have to agree with Nothus, Cronus and CrusaderPete. The patronising, condescending and downright bigoted comments of the overgrown public schoolboy type
commentators and pundits caused me to have to switch off in the end. Required one month's notice given to BT Sport to cancel subscription. No more Union for me thanks. Absolute cr@p anyway.

Thats strange, you, nor anybody else on this thread, didn't say anything about the commentators last week even though they were the same people as this week. Its almost as if, because you couldn't bag the actual game this week, you and your fellow moonies invented some other puerile reason to bag it. And paying to watch a sport you detest?

Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Sat Dec 13, 2014 8:06 pm  

gutterfax wrote:

Believe me, me calling you unbalanced is you getting off lightly.

Get over yourself!

Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Sat Dec 13, 2014 8:09 pm  

The Avenger wrote:

Get over yourself!

Ooops....here comes the cavalry