Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:20 am  

The Avenger wrote:

You've included a few that for one legitimate reason or another RL has every right to play in, it just shows your ignorance!

Sc-avenger, as you full well know I was making a legitimate point that we are hardly in a position to mock other sports about parasitical behaviour, given we use either loaned or shared stadiums. The fact you ignored my main point to focus on the minutiae shows your... ignorance

Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:07 am  

galliant wrote:

Sc-avenger, as you full well know I was making a legitimate point that we are hardly in a position to mock other sports about parasitical behaviour, given we use either loaned or shared stadiums. The fact you ignored my main point to focus on the minutiae shows your... ignorance

'We'
So we are supposed to believe that someone who has so far only posted to defend rugby union, is a rugby league fan. Yeah, really.

And moving into a stadium built with your club in mind just as much as the football club or using it for a cup final is hardly parasitic behaviour. Buying a stadium in a town with no connection to the club, draping the statues in your clubs flag and doing everything you can to marginalise the locals is. Just ask Wasps, Sale Sharks, Saracens and London Irish.

Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Mon Dec 22, 2014 11:50 am  

galliant wrote:

Sc-avenger, as you full well know I was making a legitimate point that we are hardly in a position to mock other sports about parasitical behaviour, given we use either loaned or shared stadiums. The fact you ignored my main point to focus on the minutiae shows your... ignorance

Ha Ha er Not!

It's so childish to bastardise someone's name to attempt a cheap and pathetic dig.

The fact that you had to use stadiums at which Rugby League has a share of tenancy, ownership or was originally part of the grant applications for funding means your point is illegitimate and highlights your bafoonity and ignorance!

Please do not use the Royal "we" when refering to genuine Rugby League fans, you are not one of us. You are a Union follower, a subservient alter ego and a troll!

Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Mon Dec 22, 2014 12:14 pm  

i am a lover of both sports, we do exist, though probably not in your mind. as for the name, its called banter if u can't take it, don't give it

Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Mon Dec 22, 2014 12:24 pm  

galliant wrote:

i am a lover of both sports, we do exist, though probably not in your mind. as for the name, its called banter if u can't take it, don't give it

It is a hanging offence on RL boards to openly suggest that union and league fans can sometimes be the same person.

Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:22 pm  

I'm curious as to how Sam Burgess is doing, is there an appropriate thread?

Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:24 pm  

TheScientist wrote:

I'm curious as to how Sam Burgess is doing, is there an appropriate thread?

You could try the "other sports" forum. It's where all RU chat used to be posted when this place was moderated

Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:27 pm  

galliant wrote:

i am a lover of both sports

30 posts of Union trolling says otherwise.

Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Mon Dec 22, 2014 3:00 pm  

galliant wrote:

i am a lover of both sports, we do exist, though probably not in your mind. as for the name, its called banter if u can't take it, don't give it

Wow you've got more reverse gears than an Italian tank!

Re: Sam Burgess Union debut : Mon Dec 22, 2014 5:28 pm  

The Avenger wrote:

Wow you've got more reverse gears than an Italian tank!

Showing your age there Gambit!