The Avenger wrote:
Really, are you honestly basing an argument on Unions published crowd figures
What published crowd figures do you have a problem with? Feel free to list them and what it is about them you have doubts about.....
tenerifeRhino wrote:
Unions published crowd figures always look quite suspicious.
And they use the double header and "the big game" games attendance and add to each participating team adding an extra 220,000 spectators who never exsisted.
What would SL average be if you added to 45,000 to each clubs attendance from the magic weekend
1. The Double header crowd is added to the averages of the "two" home teams and not all 4, but don't let facts get in the way of your opinion.
2. The Double Header event is actually a regular season "home" game for the 2 first named teams and therefore they get a share of the revenue. This has been done by the NRL in the past for games at Brisbane.
3. Magic Weekend is not a regular home game and the clubs do not share in the revenue...it is a money making event for the RFL that does nothing for the clubs other than skew the fixtures.
4. The Big games events are again stand alone regular season games where the "home" team are in receipt of the takings. If Leeds Rhinos took a game to elland road and got 35,000 that would count as part of their average...why don't they? Sarracens and Quins are to be applauded for their initiatives, not sneered at for their success.
5. By suspicious when referring to Unions crowds, what exactly do you mean? There are plenty of crowds in RL that end in ,000 that we accept. Or is it the Average for Quins being bigger than their capacity at the stoop?
Pay careful attention now.....10 games at the stoop and 1, with 82,000 in attendance at Twickenham. If they averaged 12,500 at the stoop, their seasons average would be...18,818........but their stadium only holds 14,850. Are they lying or are they just smart, by creating an event that boosts their coffers?