: Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:34 pm  

well I will be the first to madmit I was wrong, well done guys, any result in Widnes is a good one.

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:55 pm  

FredParky wrote:

well I will be the first to admit I was wrong, well done guys, any result in Widnes is a good one.

ditto

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:15 pm  

And I'll be the first to say I was completely correct

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:16 pm  

It was a bad game Keith because the Ref was a biased lover. I think that the tenacity of our pack and defence coupled with the east stand demoralised the Wignes pack. I think Laughton marched us from the Wignes 10 to our own 10, five times with penalties that he was letting go when they were defending. He and the RFL should take a good look at his and the two fools running the line today. some of the decisions were absolutely mind boggling. The best one was. He coudn't see Morty getting the ball down for the winning try and Tweedle Dee and Tweddle Dumber were a mile behind. I personally thought he was short. If it was an SL game it would have been a two minute decision by the video ref.

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:20 pm  

TV BOY wrote:

It was a bad game Keith because the Ref was a biased lover. I think that the tenacity of our pack and defence coupled with the east stand demoralised the Wignes pack. I think Laughton marched us from the Wignes 10 to our own 10, five times with penalties that he was letting go when they were defending. He and the RFL should take a good look at his and the two fools running the line today. some of the decisions were absolutely mind boggling. The best one was. He coudn't see Morty getting the ball down for the winning try and Tweedle Dee and Tweddle Dumber were a mile behind. I personally thought he was short. If it was an SL game it would have been a two minute decision by the video ref.

Ball definately touched the line. Only just, but a definate try!

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:22 pm  

TV BOY wrote:

It was a bad game Keith because the Ref was a biased lover. I think that the tenacity of our pack and defence coupled with the east stand demoralised the Wignes pack. I think Laughton marched us from the Wignes 10 to our own 10, five times with penalties that he was letting go when they were defending. He and the RFL should take a good look at his and the two fools running the line today. some of the decisions were absolutely mind boggling. The best one was. He coudn't see Morty getting the ball down for the winning try and Tweedle Dee and Tweddle Dumber were a mile behind.

I personally thought he was short

. If it was an SL game it would have been a two minute decision by the video ref.

Don't give them any ammo not the only one who thought that though i must admit!

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:24 pm  

I think a tiny whisker of the ball touched the line, and that's good enough for me. After the amount of forward pass decisions that the North Stand gave, I think it was only fair that the East Stand gave a decision as well

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:31 pm  

I told you it could go either way

After the constant biased performance from Ronnie, he gave us a good decision the one that mattered. Was hard to say whether it was down I was too far too judge but that East stand erupted.

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:36 pm  

Well done . you earned your win, you looked far more likely to score tries over the 80 minutes than we did, and defended quite well to, despite bringing the worst team you had in years down to our place.

You want tkl back?

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:48 pm  

Was near the grounding and the ball touched the line and thats a try The ref should be made to sit through that match along with trainee refs to see how not to ref a game thought he was very bad at times.