London (H) : Tue Apr 12, 2022 8:59 pm  

Yes, aware that this is somewhat jumping the gun, but thought that it might be an interesting topic for discussion.

Fev have loaned Dane Chisholm to Broncos for two weeks, a period that expires just after the latters' visit to LSV.

This mined from The Bulls' forum:

dddooommm wrote:

......Some Rovers fans on Twitter are suggesting that they are attempting to strengthen the teams that are playing against Leigh to try and gain an advantage at the top of the league.

Don't think, with the greatest of respect to both DC and LB, we need worry too much about this loan, but would be interested to learn who (from Fev) posters wouldn't want to meet every other week.

Bongser also asks, if this is to be taken as a genuine tactic, are Rovers fretting?

[Dick Jones]

Re: London (H) : Wed Apr 13, 2022 6:19 am  

Interesting but still can’t see London causing us any issues

Re: London (H) : Thu Apr 14, 2022 9:43 pm  

Personally it wouldn’t surprise me if Dane has played his last game at Fev. He doesn’t appear to fit in with Big MaCs structured game plan and given the fact that we have Jacks/Smith/Holmes/Gill/Wildie/Jones as well as Dane for 2 half back spots plus hooker and maybe one bench spot something has to give since 7 into 4 doesn’t fit. FWIW Holmes is just back from a loan deal at Sheffield without playing Leigh.

Re: London (H) : Sun Apr 17, 2022 9:08 pm  

Come to Leigh Dane Chisholm. Not sure Fev would want to sell to Leigh.

[Dick Jones]

Re: London (H) : Sun Apr 17, 2022 9:27 pm  

No really much chance of London causing us a isssue

Re: London (H) : Mon Apr 18, 2022 8:25 am  

Dane Chisholm surplus to requirements at Fev now they have signed Jonathan Ford.

[Dick Jones]

Re: London (H) : Mon Apr 18, 2022 8:57 am  

They won’t let us sign him even i we wanted to

Re: London (H) : Mon Apr 18, 2022 1:13 pm  

Wouldn't want Chisholm anyway. No better than what we have already got and there's likely better in Oz.
Surprised we were not able to sign Ford. Maybe there are other irons in the fire!

Re: London (H) : Mon Apr 18, 2022 1:21 pm  

J7P1 wrote:

Wouldn't want Chisholm anyway. No better than what we have already got and there's likely better in Oz.
Surprised we were not able to sign Ford. Maybe there are other irons in the fire!

My thoughts too.

Re: London (H) : Mon Apr 18, 2022 2:26 pm  

Not sure I wanted Ford either. He is a liability in defence and does not like being tackled. Just get Ioanne or Amone to charge at him and a huge gap will appear.