: Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:01 pm  

Surreyben wrote:

I'm not a massive fan of Danny Ward I have to say.

And I thought I was alone

: Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:39 pm  

Dave Lister wrote:

Indeed, good news. Him and LMS our two best props IMO.

Agreed shame they cant do 80 mins each. Or at least 65.

: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:36 pm  

Surreyben wrote:

I'm not a massive fan of Danny Ward I have to say.

He's not flash, he just gets on with the work, you can not really know he is on the pitch sometimes but we sure do miss him when he isn't.

: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:37 pm  

Tre Cool wrote:

Agreed shame they cant do 80 mins each. Or at least 65.

Still, better than a certain Wigan-based prop.....

: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:10 am  

PC Plum wrote:

You've got to say on the basis of the season so far, Heckenburg and Gafa will be gone for 2010 and I will add Haggerty to that list if he doesn't start getting his act together.

I'll be disappointed if Haggerty leaves for 2010.
He can be immense at times.
He's obviously recovering from injury, give him some time.

: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:27 am  

tim791 wrote:

I'll be disappointed if Haggerty leaves for 2010.
He can be immense at times.
He's obviously recovering from injury, give him some time.

Agreed - but if we end up with the Salford Haggerty, that's not too good. Summed up, after his knock on towards the end of the game on Sat, he stood and watched the ball be scooped up and allowed the player to waltz to the line - basic rule of the game, if you mess up / fix up, he was sloppy and lazy.

: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:32 pm  

I got no probs with the props we got.

: Tue Jul 14, 2009 8:21 pm  

I agree, give "Hagger's" a chance to get a bit of matchplay under his belt after his lay-off & I'm sure he will start to perform.

: Wed Jul 15, 2009 1:00 am  

BRONCO BILLY wrote:

I agree, give "Hagger's" a chance to get a bit of matchplay under his belt after his lay-off & I'm sure he will start to perform.

Wonder if you'd say the same if you were paying his salary? If I was DH I wouldn't be.