: Tue Mar 31, 2009 6:34 pm  

No surprise to us, Marsdengiant.

We appear to be the only team that cops a mass ban for a few handbags between players.

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:06 pm  

Dan Stains woz God wrote:

No surprise to us, Marsdengiant.

We appear to be the only team that cops a mass ban for a few handbags between players.

Howell got a ban for beating himself up.

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:34 pm  

Absolutely ridiculous - he runs over to something he wasn't involved in, smacks someone in the back of the head and gets a fine

[Durham Giant]

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:02 pm  

Paddock Punter wrote:

Absolutely ridiculous - he runs over to something he wasn't involved in, smacks someone in the back of the head and gets a fine

Why dont you read the RFL report before commenting on something you know nothing about.

Apparently he was warned that if it had been aginst any team other than Wigan it would have been a 4 match ban.

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:08 pm  

Durham Giant wrote:

Why dont you read the RFL report before commenting on something you know nothing about.

Apparently he was warned that if it had been aginst any team other than Wigan it would have been a 4 match ban.

Light touch paper and post on Pies board

[Durham Giant]

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:27 pm  

[quote="Windy one"][/quote] Well you did suggest it so check out how this thread will go down http://forums.rlfans.com/posting.php?mode=newtopic&f=28 Locked in about 5 minutes i would guess. MY mistake 2 minutes.

[quote="Windy one"][/quote] Well you did suggest it so check out how this thread will go down http://forums.rlfans.com/posting.php?mode=newtopic&f=28 Locked in about 5 minutes i would guess. MY mistake 2 minutes.

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:15 am  

from this...... to this All very inconsistant....

from this...... to this All very inconsistant....

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:20 am  

gutterfax wrote: from this...... to this All very inconsistant.... Thats pretty damning. Can't help but feel victimised.

gutterfax wrote: from this...... to this All very inconsistant.... Thats pretty damning. Can't help but feel victimised.

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:49 am  

gutterfax wrote: from this...... to this All very inconsistant.... Good post GF......why not send it on to Phil Clarke (following his comments last week on Quins penalty stats). A clear case of same issue but different treatment........let`s not forget we had 4 players banned following the Catalan match (I think it was 3 for fighting and an `alleged` high tackle from Clubby.........with only Mogg being penalised for the froggies) There have been 3 or 4 fight incidents this season already but not one has been dealt with the same severity dished out to Quins. I don`t care if a ban is applied or not......just that the RFL treat everybody the same.

gutterfax wrote: from this...... to this All very inconsistant.... Good post GF......why not send it on to Phil Clarke (following his comments last week on Quins penalty stats). A clear case of same issue but different treatment........let`s not forget we had 4 players banned following the Catalan match (I think it was 3 for fighting and an `alleged` high tackle from Clubby.........with only Mogg being penalised for the froggies) There have been 3 or 4 fight incidents this season already but not one has been dealt with the same severity dished out to Quins. I don`t care if a ban is applied or not......just that the RFL treat everybody the same.

: Wed Apr 01, 2009 10:01 am  

Mason got a £300 fine and no ban I think. Seeing the incident on the SL Show on iPlayer last night it was far far worse than LMS and was worthy of at a least five game ban.


Defo a case of one rule for US and another for every other team. Mason was like an animal.

Shame on the RL.