Re: Dan Sarginson : Fri May 10, 2013 4:36 pm  

jaybs wrote:

What a sad reflection on Our Club! I feel he has great potential and before Louis moved to Saints many of our fans did not rate him but I always did, I think he is now struggling at St Helens as they do not have a strong pack and he is out of his depth having to lead as prop! just shows the North/M62 is not always the Promised Land, many Saints fans would be glad to see him go, but rumours are they have just offered him another three years. I see Dan at Wigan becoming a full back, it will be sad to see him go just when we at last have young players with Potential! perhaps they know more than us???

I wonder if these are just signs that the NRL supply line has dried up with their bucketloads of cash keeping players in Oz instead of travelling over here. The M62 has never produced enough quality players for every club and has plugged the gaps with aussie players. If they are forced to look at our unproven suspect younger players things must be bad in their acadamies.

Re: Dan Sarginson : Fri May 10, 2013 5:26 pm  

Snoopy wrote:

I wonder if these are just signs that the NRL supply line has dried up with their bucketloads of cash keeping players in Oz instead of travelling over here. The M62 has never produced enough quality players for every club and has plugged the gaps with aussie players. If they are forced to look at our unproven suspect younger players things must be bad in their acadamies.

The exchange rate is not that good as well but as you say the NRL have the big monies not like the RFL and sponsors such as Brut after shave, the official after shave of RL!

Saints fans do not seem impressed with Chubb, but again they have not bought big for ages, no longer Big Names from Aussie but failing stars.

Re: Dan Sarginson : Sat May 11, 2013 12:21 am  

Never got the hype with Sargie, yes he makes the odd break but never passes (aside from the questionable offloads) and not really up to scratch in defence. I'd still like him to stay and have a chance to develop further with us as there's clearly some raw talent but no huge loss if he goes imo.

Re: Dan Sarginson : Mon May 13, 2013 8:05 pm  

In today's trade press that he's been offered a three year deal by Wigan.
At the end of the season Wigan will lose Richards and likely Sam T as well.
Rumours are that Tom Briscoe could be the replacement winger for Richards so I'd expect Sarginson to replace Sam.
We have great younger players who can play full back or wing in Tierney and Hampshire for fb plus Manfredi and Burgess at wing but they are only 18 apart from Manfredi and all are some way off regular first team rugby.

Re: Dan Sarginson : Mon May 13, 2013 10:20 pm  

Dixon will be off as well

Re: Dan Sarginson : Mon May 13, 2013 11:32 pm  

daftdad wrote:

Dixon will be off as well

You heard something or just presuming?

Re: Dan Sarginson : Tue May 14, 2013 6:54 am  

daftdad wrote:

Dixon will be off as well

He recently signed for London Broncos till end of 2014.

I assume that David Hughes has enough insight to realise that Dixon must be retained.

Re: Dan Sarginson : Tue May 14, 2013 8:23 pm  

Grimmy wrote:

Is strongly rumoured to be joining us (Wigan) next season. What are your thoughts on him? I must confess I know little about any of your players

Why should the mighty Wigan know anything about our players? If you know nothing about Dan, we are not going to help you, arrogant git.

Re: Dan Sarginson : Wed May 15, 2013 1:18 pm  

Ronniequin wrote:

Why should the mighty Wigan know anything about our players? If you know nothing about Dan, we are not going to help you, arrogant git.

Who rattled your cage? Calm down!

Re: Dan Sarginson : Thu May 16, 2013 6:11 am  

The Penguin wrote:

Who rattled your cage? Calm down!

Well said Sir

Where did that come from totaly uncalled for.

Looking forward to seeing you guy's (and Gal's) for another great Rugby League day out at the Stoop this Saturday.

Regards , EW