nick slyney : Tue Mar 03, 2015 11:50 am  

Looks like we have lost him to injury for the next 2-3 months.

Glen Riley expected back soon. And Hendo will look over the next couple of weeks where he thinks need to strengthen.

Well he could start with two take no prisoners forwards lol

Re: nick slyney : Tue Mar 03, 2015 11:58 am  

Time to get a no nonsense monster prop from somewhere to cover for Nick!

[brian2]

Re: nick slyney : Tue Mar 03, 2015 12:27 pm  

If he is out for 2/3 months its a big loss - we are lightweight in the pack and i think we need 3 big men asap

Re: nick slyney : Tue Mar 03, 2015 1:09 pm  

We need props?

De j'vous anyone?

Re: nick slyney : Tue Mar 03, 2015 4:33 pm  

Ted Chappelhow from Widnes is worth looking at and is a big lad

Re: nick slyney : Tue Mar 03, 2015 4:54 pm  

Anyone we could get on dual reg from Wakey?

Re: nick slyney : Tue Mar 03, 2015 7:38 pm  

So that's a second/back rower who walked out on us and the main prop injured long term. Need reinforcements soonest. The feedback from the Leigh fans seem to suggest we were light up front Sunday.

Let's see how our DR works with Wakey.

Re: nick slyney : Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:39 pm  

wire quin wrote:

Let's see how our DR works with Wakey.

Talking of which I see in this week's League Express Rowley and perennial moaning Minnie Aston are complaining of the unfair advantage DR gives the Broncos. And there was I thinking their teams had been the last two to beat London.

Re: nick slyney : Tue Mar 03, 2015 11:00 pm  

Sarf Essex Taff wrote:

Talking of which I see in this week's League Express Rowley and perennial moaning Minnie Aston are complaining of the unfair advantage DR gives the Broncos. And there was I thinking their teams had been the last two to beat London.

They are taking the mickey as usual. Too easy for the northern teams to sign and retain players in a small geographical area. They should apply for the vacant managers job at Broncos if they had any talent.

Re: nick slyney : Wed Mar 04, 2015 9:20 am  

CrusaderPete wrote:

We need props?

De j'vous anyone?

Or even déjà vu