Grass : Thu Oct 01, 2015 4:04 pm  

So what do people think about the move to an artificial surface?

Re: Grass : Thu Oct 01, 2015 4:09 pm  

I like smoking it.

Re: Grass : Thu Oct 01, 2015 4:38 pm  

Nothing wrong with a move to an all weather pitch, not done widnes any harm.
Agree it would have been nice had it been at a better location, but we are where we are so let's see what happens

Despite the doom mongers, development of the facilties is not out of the question, what is quite difficult is access should we get to situation where away teams bring coaches.
Think training on and playing on a consistent playing surface has got to be an advantage at home, only problem is you still have the games away from home where you end up playing on a mud patch aka early on in season up in cumbria

Re: Grass : Thu Oct 01, 2015 7:37 pm  

mickyb1234 wrote:

Nothing wrong with a move to an all weather pitch, not done widnes any harm.
Agree it would have been nice had it been at a better location, but we are where we are so let's see what happens

Despite the doom mongers, development of the facilties is not out of the question, what is quite difficult is access should we get to situation where away teams bring coaches.
Think training on and playing on a consistent playing surface has got to be an advantage at home, only problem is you still have the games away from home where you end up playing on a mud patch aka early on in season up in cumbria

Why mention it? This is why threads 'drift", because you leave juicy worms like this and I'm a growing lad ....away coaches is the last of the problems any development would face

I think the facilities at RTF will be fine, as we'll have the option to train on their grass pitches in the early months of the season in preparation for the quagmires of the north

Re: Grass : Thu Oct 01, 2015 8:26 pm  

OK I will say it in simple words. Development of Ealing grasshoppers facility has already been discussed and looked at, it is not out of the question.
Access is however an issue.
Are those words simple enough.
It's not thread drift it's discussing the pitch we are going to be playing on

Re: Grass : Thu Oct 01, 2015 8:37 pm  

mickyb1234 wrote:

OK I will say it in simple words.

Thanks.

mickyb1234 wrote:

Development of Ealing grasshoppers facility has already been discussed and looked at, it is not out of the question.

Really? Do you have any links to these discussions and specifically the bits about planning permission being sought and gained and any consultation that has been done with the residents of the local streets or the local school, some of whom have a history....sorry, DOCUMENTED history of objecting to planning requests. And Michael,you're taking the word of the owner who said "it can be developed" I suggest youo back to read the promises and projections he's delivered over the years and see which ones have come true.

mickyb1234 wrote:

Access is however an issue.

Access is the number 1 issue when it comes to any development, along with a plethora of other reasons why take many years to get any sort of approval for developing the ground.

mickyb1234 wrote:

Are those words simple enough.

simple and naive Michael...like their author!

mickyb1234 wrote:

It's not thread drift it's discussing the pitch we are going to be playing on

It is a thread drift, because the topic was the surface, not the location..........you naughty boy you. Watch out for the self styled moderator of truth and justice RONNIEQUIN......he'll report you to Dave on Sunday

Re: Grass : Thu Oct 01, 2015 8:43 pm  

Which owner?
Who mentioned any owner?
And good to see you are resorting to type and poor personal insults, well done

Re: Grass : Thu Oct 01, 2015 9:02 pm  

Ealing Grasshoppers (sic) would be a good rebrand for the Broncos given the amount of wandering around London the club does.

Re: Grass : Thu Oct 01, 2015 9:10 pm  

The surfaces should be fine for training and playing on. Will probably need to train on the grass pitches occasionally to keep sharp for away games.

Re: Grass : Thu Oct 01, 2015 9:25 pm  

mickyb1234 wrote:

Which owner?
Who mentioned any owner?
And good to see you are resorting to type and poor personal insults, well done

Michael, you are basing your belief that the ground can be developed on a conversation you had with someone who attends the Union games and the video/forum comments from the club. If you choose to ignore the litany of failures and broken promises left in the wake of prior promises and claims then so be it.
As for insults....you were the one who claimed you'd use "simple words"...so stop being so precious.