[Wigan6/Leeds1 Andy]

Re: Rangi Chase for £350,000 : Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:24 pm  

Jukesays wrote:

Probably been out drinking with Gelling eh Geoff and it was his fault?

Couldn't finish a pint that lad.

Re: Rangi Chase for £350,000 : Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:29 pm  

Wigan28/Leeds18 Andy wrote:

Couldn't finish a pint that lad.

Rangi Chase was going to buy him one, decided not to as Gelling would probably drop it anyway, so had both himself which led to him being drunk and missing training!

Just realised it is Gellings fault!

Re: Rangi Chase for £350,000 : Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:39 pm  

Jukesays wrote:

Rangi Chase was going to buy him one, decided not to as Gelling would probably drop it anyway, so had both himself which led to him being drunk and missing training!

Just realised it is Gellings fault!

Actaully, I blame Mathers.

Re: Rangi Chase for £350,000 : Wed Jul 11, 2012 1:20 pm  

Jukesays wrote:

Probably been out drinking with Gelling eh Geoff and it was his fault?

Far better chance that it was Gleeson.

Re: Rangi Chase for £350,000 : Wed Jul 11, 2012 1:38 pm  

stillinthepast wrote:

Far better chance that it was Gleeson.

And if that was true then I reckon a few people would "Hypothisise" that it was Gellings idea

Re: Rangi Chase for £350,000 : Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:43 am  

With all this trouble Cas might want rid if we can get him cheap/on the free is he not worth a punt?
If he does any of this again we could have him on gross misconduct and say bye to him.
I don't normally agree with having people who we know are trouble (after Gleeson) but we dont really have another option at the moment do we?

Re: Rangi Chase for £350,000 : Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:45 am  

Jukesays wrote:

Rangi Chase was going to buy him one, decided not to as Gelling would probably drop it anyway, so had both himself which led to him being drunk and missing training!

Re: Rangi Chase for £350,000 : Fri Jul 13, 2012 8:43 am  

I doubt we will let him go on the "Cheap".

We were originally going to be holding out for 500k for him, But i think we can rest assured that wont be happening.

If an offer of 300k came in now, It would be VERY hard to turn down. Luke Gale is available at Bradford for a minimal fee, And would be a simple replacement.

Steve Ferres from what i hear, Likes to get the product right on the pitch, So that means keeping Chase, Or, Getting a decent fee for him, To reinvest into the squad.


(You have more chance of getting Chase, Than Wire do of getting Daryl Clark, Put it that way)

Re: Rangi Chase for £350,000 : Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:02 am  

Dettoriman wrote:

I doubt we will let him go on the "Cheap".

We were originally going to be holding out for 500k for him, But i think we can rest assured that wont be happening.

If an offer of 300k came in now, It would be VERY hard to turn down. Luke Gale is available at Bradford for a minimal fee, And would be a simple replacement.

Steve Ferres from what i hear, Likes to get the product right on the pitch, So that means keeping Chase, Or, Getting a decent fee for him, To reinvest into the squad.


(You have more chance of getting Chase, Than Wire do of getting Daryl Clark, Put it that way)

Hahaha funniest thing I have heard in quite a long time. Thanks for making my morning!

No thanks. I wouldn't take him on a free transfer.

Re: Rangi Chase for £350,000 : Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:45 am  

Dettoriman wrote:

I doubt we will let him go on the "Cheap".

We were originally going to be holding out for 500k for him, But i think we can rest assured that wont be happening.

If an offer of 300k came in now, It would be VERY hard to turn down. Luke Gale is available at Bradford for a minimal fee, And would be a simple replacement.

Steve Ferres from what i hear, Likes to get the product right on the pitch, So that means keeping Chase, Or, Getting a decent fee for him, To reinvest into the squad.


(You have more chance of getting Chase, Than Wire do of getting Daryl Clark, Put it that way)

would be a better option for us if we ignored Chase and signed Gale imo