Re: Potential Bans? : Mon May 28, 2012 1:57 pm  

Shaun Magennis (Grade D) of St Helens, and Chris Tuson (Grade C) Lee Mossop (Grade B) Gareth Hock (Grade B) all from Wigan

From Official SL twitter

Mossop's got til 11am tomorrow to submit early guilty plea.

Re: Potential Bans? : Mon May 28, 2012 2:00 pm  

Magennis receives grade D
Tuson C
Hock & Mossop B

A NFA -1
B 1 – 2
C 2 -3
D 3-5
E 4-8
F 8+ or period suspension

Re: Potential Bans? : Mon May 28, 2012 2:02 pm  

WARRIORCRAIG wrote:

Shaun Magennis (Grade D) of St Helens, and Chris Tuson (Grade C) Lee Mossop (Grade B) Gareth Hock (Grade B) all from Wigan

From Official SL twitter

Mossop's got til 11am tomorrow to submit early guilty plea.

hock ..1 match
mossop 1 match
tuson 2 matches

maggennis..sending off sufficient ( or 3 matches)

Re: Potential Bans? : Mon May 28, 2012 2:15 pm  

So our pack ends up decimated for the next game at least, if not more. Saints lose a bit part player who no-one had heard of prior to yesterday anyway and will more than likely fall back into obscurity from hereon in. Meanwhile, the instigator walks away scot free.
Only in Rugby League.

Re: Potential Bans? : Mon May 28, 2012 2:17 pm  

I personally think Mossop should get one game. Hock should be sending off sufficient. Tuson should get 1 games... and the scumbag should get 8+. Just my opinion

Re: Potential Bans? : Mon May 28, 2012 2:17 pm  

WARRIORCRAIG wrote:

Shaun Magennis (Grade D) of St Helens, and Chris Tuson (Grade C) Lee Mossop (Grade B) Gareth Hock (Grade B) all from Wigan

From Official SL twitter

Mossop's got til 11am tomorrow to submit early guilty plea.

Mossop should take the early plea, hasn't got a hope in hell of winning that one.

[Wigan6/Leeds1 Andy]

Re: Potential Bans? : Mon May 28, 2012 2:20 pm  

Looking at it:

Mossop takes the early guilty plea - misses Leeds but back for Catalans.
Hock - pled guilty with provocation and given he was actually sent off hope he just gets one game so back for Catalans.
Tuson is looking at 2 given he was sent off.

So Hughes, Crosby and Spencer into the 17 for Friday.

Re: Potential Bans? : Mon May 28, 2012 2:20 pm  

WIGAN FOREVER wrote:

So our pack ends up decimated for the next game at least, if not more. Saints lose a bit part player who no-one had heard of prior to yesterday anyway and will more than likely fall back into obscurity from hereon in. Meanwhile, the instigator walks away scot free.
Only in Rugby League.

Well we are playing Leeds this week...

Re: Potential Bans? : Mon May 28, 2012 2:25 pm  

Nothing for McCarthy-Scarsbrook?

Ok he didn't throw any punches but he instigated the whole incident and there was no need for him to put his face into Hock's in the first place.

Also anything been mentioned about McIlorum's possible high shot on LMS?

Re: Potential Bans? : Mon May 28, 2012 2:40 pm  

Coventry Warrior! wrote:

Nothing for McCarthy-Scarsbrook?

Ok he didn't throw any punches but he instigated the whole incident and there was no need for him to put his face into Hock's in the first place.

Also anything been mentioned about McIlorum's possible high shot on LMS?

Mac seems to be okay for Friday NFA.

This was for a tackle on Gardner.