Kyle Amor : Sat Sep 02, 2017 9:08 am  

Just been reading the St Helens forum.

Looks like the fans giving him a hard time.

As were probably going to be in the hunt for props, would he be worth a shout, if he were to become available

Was a fans favourite in his previous spell with us.

Re: Kyle Amor : Sat Sep 02, 2017 9:22 am  

He's a bit like Tautai - we loved him because he was a Leeds reject, a big character and a grafter; but he has the same errors in him now that he had for us - good for a few cock-ups in every game. Maybe he suffers in comparison to Walmsley - but he's not a prop I look at and wish we had.

Re: Kyle Amor : Sat Sep 02, 2017 9:25 am  

Eastern Wildcat wrote:

Just been reading the St Helens forum.

Looks like the fans giving him a hard time.

As were probably going to be in the hunt for props, would he be worth a shout, if he were to become available

Was a fans favourite in his previous spell with us.

In my opinion I think Kyle played his best for us, hence being at Saints, but I just don't think he plays as good as he can for them. Would be a nice addition if it happened but I don't think it would as he wanted away while with us and also so called bigger clubs with bigger pockets will I'm sure be in the hunt.

[PopTart]

Re: Kyle Amor : Sat Sep 02, 2017 9:39 am  

I liked him at Wakefield and he deserved his chance to move to a bigger club.
Times have changed now. I assume his salary is higher and he'll also tempt other clubs.

So I'd take him, but he isn't top of my list.
We can attract good players now so don't have to settle for just anything, and I'd rather have the type of player Amor was when we got him, who is hungry to prove himself.
I'd still take Mullally from Leeds

As Cas are looking at other props, I'd keep my eye on Springer and Cook. Both would go well with us. Especially Springer.

Re: Kyle Amor : Sat Sep 02, 2017 10:21 am  

bren2k wrote:

He's a bit like Tautai - we loved him because he was a Leeds reject, a big character and a grafter; but he has the same errors in him now that he had for us - good for a few cock-ups in every game. Maybe he suffers in comparison to Walmsley - but he's not a prop I look at and wish we had.

Don't normally disagree with your opinion on players but I do here. Amor is first class far more than a Saints reject IMHO. Saints fans are fickle and tend not to value graft which is Amor's big strength.

I'd have him back in a heart beat, he'd start every game IMO.

Fifita, England, Amor, Huby and with Hirst and Baldwinson as back up - that would be a monster unit.

Re: Kyle Amor : Sat Sep 02, 2017 10:44 am  

PopTart wrote:

I liked him at Wakefield and he deserved his chance to move to a bigger club.
Times have changed now. I assume his salary is higher and he'll also tempt other clubs.

So I'd take him, but he isn't top of my list.
We can attract good players now so don't have to settle for just anything, and I'd rather have the type of player Amor was when we got him, who is hungry to prove himself.
I'd still take Mullally from Leeds

As Cas are looking at other props, I'd keep my eye on Springer and Cook. Both would go well with us. Especially Springer.

I thought I'd read somewhere that Springer is on the move at the end of this contract.
Edited. He signed a two yr extension in February.

Re: Kyle Amor : Sat Sep 02, 2017 12:21 pm  

I'd have Amor back in a heartbeat.

Re: Kyle Amor : Sat Sep 02, 2017 6:05 pm  

I'd have him back. Think he liked it here but I can't see Saints letting him go unless he's OOC?

Re: Kyle Amor : Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:54 pm  

Regarding Tautai. He's a liability for Wigan.

Re: Kyle Amor : Sat Sep 02, 2017 8:19 pm  

Liability with a new 3 yr contract