Shame it didn’t happen earlier, we could have purchased the ground from the NCA at cost price rather than the vastly over-inflated price we did. Annoying as well that by the sounds of it he gets to keep the cash from his dirty dealings.
Shame it didn’t happen earlier, we could have purchased the ground from the NCA at cost price rather than the vastly over-inflated price we did. Annoying as well that by the sounds of it he gets to keep the cash from his dirty dealings.
that cost price may reduce as it's not like it cost them anything
But what has he done wrong? He's named his price and we've paid. If it was worth much less, then that's our fault.
It would depend if when he first bought BV, he did it with "dirty money." The court could then look at reclaiming a further asset from him up to the value, if available - of that cost.