Re: Big Sam : Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:27 pm  

wolfie wrote:

Reece,not sure how bad it is tho.

what was the injury???

Re: Big Sam : Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:30 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote: Cheers - not sure where the U20s table is online? Can't see it on our website nor on the HDM site or the RFL one. Fantastic start for Lasty and the boys, that's for sure. Not including game tonight... http://www.saintsrlfc.com/team/12

Mrs Barista wrote: Cheers - not sure where the U20s table is online? Can't see it on our website nor on the HDM site or the RFL one. Fantastic start for Lasty and the boys, that's for sure. Not including game tonight... http://www.saintsrlfc.com/team/12

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:55 am  

wolfie wrote:

why should i ?

Because it's an opportunity to show you have some free will and aren't just agar's lackie

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 7:24 am  

on last weeks game, moa should be a shoe-in, he was the guy who got us on the front foot when he entered the fray

a chance for sam to have the same effect and the team to bounce off his enthusiasm in a major cup game on his own patch should be enough to confirm his selection

however, with the clown we have as coach im not holding my breath

drop yak, hes been shocking and only looks half effective on heavy pitches

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 7:29 am  

Well I didn't see the game last week but by all accounts Moa played well, he was also very good in the Warrington game and should get a game this week. If he doesn't then thats Agar's choice and fair enough, but you've got to question why he would sign someone on quota when he only intened to play him in the event of injuries.

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 7:30 am  

t.m.t.b.f. wrote:

on last weeks game, moa should be a shoe-in, he was the guy who got us on the front foot when he entered the fray

a chance for sam to have the same effect and the team to bounce off his enthusiasm in a major cup game on his own patch should be enough to confirm his selection

however, with the clown we have as coach im not holding my breath

drop yak, hes been shocking and only looks half effective on heavy pitches

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 7:50 am  

Jake the Peg wrote:

Because it's an opportunity to show you have some free will and aren't just agar's lackie

ive said if moa is left out it would be bad decission by agar,as he had a great game last week,what else would you like me to say,its not going to change things is it?

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 8:05 am  

wolfie wrote:

ive said if moa is left out it would be bad decission by agar,as he had a great game last week,what else would you like me to say,its not going to change things is it?

Well said Wolfie..I agree it makes no difference what we think or say at the end of the day it is Agars call.

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 8:14 am  

wolfie wrote:

ive said if moa is left out it would be bad decission by agar,as he had a great game last week,what else would you like me to say,its not going to change things is it?

Well said, nice to know that everything agar does isn't perfect

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 8:19 am  

So did Moa play last night or not? Agar must rate him, he went through several hoops to re-sign him. Cussack is the problem here to me. There's some hold over agar by the Yak, Agar shows a sense of loyality to Cussack far above and beyond any other player. In general, his 'stature' holds back Moa. Having said that if dowes defends like last week we will get murderd again and on that performance alone Moa should replace Dowes.