Kyle Kesik to start : Sun May 08, 2011 9:08 pm  

Mods can you please make this a sticky, and hope that the message gets back across to Tony Miller.

Please start with Kyle Keswick, and don't take him iff when he is playing well.

If you agree can you post a reply.

Re: Kyle Keswick to start : Sun May 08, 2011 10:49 pm  

Kyle Kesik to start and not go off at all.

Re: Kyle Keswick to start : Mon May 09, 2011 8:40 am  

Got to agree with the starting part .

[Jemmo]

Re: Kyle Keswick to start : Mon May 09, 2011 9:01 am  

I also agree

I don't want this to sound like we are criticising jack Ely as I think he does a good job, but think he would be better used elsewhere in the pack

Re: Kyle Keswick to start : Mon May 09, 2011 9:23 am  

To me three out of the four subs should be forwards ad not just all second rowers. It's the big guys that need a rest, not little ones like Kesik. Only Kyle Sampson is a big lad out of our four from yesterday. To be fair we made room for Grant Edwards, he took one subs place, but it will take him a fair while to get back to full lung-bursting match fitness, at that time he should start and not come off.
We are getting to the stage where a few lads will have to be left out now, disappointing as it will be, especially when Morrison and Green play. Kesik however is first on the team sheet for me, every available chance.

Re: Kyle Keswick to start : Mon May 09, 2011 10:46 am  

I totally agree and after listening to people talk when kyle was brought off when the dons were only 18-10 down i think alot of people agree. I cant understand why he is took off at such crucial moments in the game when he is playing so well. He gives 100% every week and always lifts the team spirit. Tony needs to start sorting it or i have a feeling we will lose him to another club and that really would be a shame.

[Wanderer]

Re: Kyle Kesik to start : Mon May 09, 2011 11:09 am  

Posted the following on the match thread yesterday ...

... and now my big bug-bear from today (and I'll be careful and ask it as a question) ... is Kyle Kesik not up to playing longer than he does? He gave us great go forward and imagination and I for one cannot understand why he was withdrawn at 18-10 when we seemed to be starting to cause them one or two problems?

So I too concur.

In agreement with Jemmo, I would add that it isn't a criticism of Jack Ely.

Re: Kyle Kesik to start : Mon May 09, 2011 12:18 pm  

This was always going to happen when you sign 83 hookers

Re: Kyle Kesik to start : Mon May 09, 2011 3:27 pm  

Also agree. Just look at the stats they will speak volumes. Once again i would like to stress i don't think anyone is having a go at Jack Ely as he is a good player and always gives 100%. I like Jemmo think Jack should be used as a replacement for one of the forwards as he makes good yards.

Re: Kyle Kesik to start : Mon May 09, 2011 10:26 pm  

Have to agree that it continues to mystify me how someone can 'big up' Kesik then does nt start with him,then takes him off whilst we re still in the game. However Ely is also a cracking player. May be someone needs to use a little imagination on how we use our good players.

At least whilst we re still being mystified it saves on winning money.